Chrome is Awesome but What about the Thousands of Plugins and Addons?

Many tech bloggers, columnists said thay were expecting a browser response from Google but all i want to say to them is, “you’re all lying”. Chrome is not only a browser, there has to be a google-style incomparable idea or a plan behind this. Anyway, Google Chrome is awesome as a very first beta version.  But it has a very important plugin-addon problem. Think about thousands of people written addons for Firefox. Why did they written those addons? Because there was a free-browser dream against internet explorer and it’s name was Firefox. But what happened? Google couldn’t stop itself being evil this time.  Chrome is not a response to only Firefox, it’s also a response to whole web history.

Chrome is awesome but it’s just a smooth way of browsing without addons in long term.

What can happen in near future?

1-) Google may allow Firefox addons to work with.
2-) Google may start a new chrome addons pool and start everything from the beginning.
3-) Google may has an evil plan that industry don’t know.

Only i am thinking that Chrome is Awesome?

I’m not alone. According to Google and some other web sites, the Chrome Using ratio is nearly %6 and this not bad for a 3 days old of a software.

• Google Chrome Googasm
• Watch a video from the development team on the thinking and features behind Google Chrome.
• Google Started to Re-Index Google-Penalty-Like Sites?
• “Scarcity brings clarity,” says Marissa Mayer, the blonde cyborg who runs Google’s search engine
• The Most Stupid Web Feature of 2008
• IF Google Stop Indexing My Site/Blog Why Should it Be? What should i do?
• Google has been quietly laying off staff and up to 10,000 jobs could be on the chopping block according to sources.
• Even Google is Focusing on Costs. You have to focuse too.
• Google has released a new web site to help simply and centralize information about voting locations and voter registration.
• Googlers have slowly been realizing that their job isn’t an entitlement. GOOG could lay off 10 percent of its work force and see no difference in revenue.

Comments

No Comments